Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: The myth of 18 percent gray

Subject: [OM] Re: The myth of 18 percent gray
From: Earl Dunbar <edunbar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 06:11:45 -0500
Walt, I remember your posting that, but I either didn't absorb it 
intending to return to it, or was just skimming the list while paying 
attention to something else.  Thanks for the reminder to pay attention 
to the hillbilly!

Earl

Walt Wayman wrote:

>I'm surprised some of y'all are surprised by this.  Not only did AA cover the 
>subject long ago, but within the last year I, dumb as a box of rocks though I 
>may be, posted right here a quote about it from the National Geographic 
>Photography Field Guide, which I shall repeat here, since apparently nobody 
>paid any attention then.
>
>"Scientific studies now indicate that an average scene actually reflects 13 
>percent (not 18 percent) of the light that falls on it.  For the sake of 
>consistency, gray cards have continued to be 18 percent gray, as is the one in 
>this book.  When using any 18 percent gray card for substitute metering, 
>increase exposure by a half stop (+0.5 compensation factor) for most subjects, 
>as Kodak recommends.  If the subject is very light -- a snow-covered 
>landscape, for example -- decrease exposure instead by a half stop (-0.5 
>compensation factor) from the gray card reading.  This will help maintain 
>detail and texture."
>
>Walt, who despite all the BS is occasionally informative
>
>--
>"Anything more than 500 yards from 
>the car just isn't photogenic." -- 
>Edward Weston
>
> -------------- Original message ----------------------
>From: "John A. Lind" <jalind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>  
>
>>Ansel Adams knew about this long ago and has an excellent discussion about 
>>it relatively early on in Book 2, "The Negative" of his classic 
>>trilogy.  IIRC, he (Adams) found that most light meters overexpose by an 
>>average of about 1/3rd f-stop . . . which correlates to a slightly darker 
>>than 18% gray (something slightly less than that) . . . and calls the 
>>over-exposure shift built into the meter as the "K-factor."
>>
>>-- John
>>
>>At 06:00 PM 3/22/2005, Winsor Crosby wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>One thing noticed by people who are now using histograms on cameras and
>>>in software is that metering something that is evenly lit puts all the
>>>exposure to the left of the center of the histogram. I was surprise to
>>>find that meters are really calibrated to 12 percent gray which is a
>>>half stop away. Here is a better explanation than I can offer:
>>>
>>>http://www.bythom.com/graycards.htm
>>>      
>>>


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz