Hi Daniel,
The blown out part of the image is this stuff:
http://www.geebeephoto.com/temp/posts/Farthingstone_01.html
I was using a yellow filter because I wanted to render the crop white and
you will see from this what I mean:
http://www.geebeephoto.com/2005/05113.htm
I may have been able to hold a little more detail in the white area at the
top left but I zeroed in on the tyre track and left the crop to fend for
itself. The blown highlights are not artefacts they are all my own work, or
lack thereof. :-)
An increase in contrast would mean having to hold it back to prevent the
blown highlight area spreading. It is however most definitely film not
digital. Thanks for looking.
Graham
----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel Mitchell" <danmitchell@xxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 27 April 2005 23:29
Subject: [OM] Re: #122
> Fernando Gonzalez Gentile wrote:
> > I agree it would benefit from a higher contrast; I thought about it soon
> > after the image downloaded, which left me wondering why did you choose a
> > yellow filter instead of the green one.
>
> It looks weirdly like a digital camera image, with the highlights in the
top left looking blown out -- is this an artefact of the scan, or is it like
this originally?
>
> -- dan
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|