It's also easier to read paper, than on screen. Quicker also ( without taking
into account printing time ).
Plus I suspect that there are different versions out there, somewhere. My 2
volumes have different contents & binders. The lenses in one are on bodies, the
other not!
I for one will not be bidding, I've heard nasty stories about postage out of
the
UK. Although it's tempting ...
David
Proud owner of original versions
NSURIT@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
> In a message dated 5/3/2005 10:28:06 PM Central Standard Time,
> olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
> OK, I'll bite. Why would I want this in preference to the eSIF CD that
> sits in one of my CD drives all the time?
>
>
>
> Perhaps a little easier to use. You can touch it. It works even when your
> computer doesn't. Looks good on your book shelf. Hell, I don't know.
> Maybe,
> just because its there.
>
> I may be the last guy in the world who uses a dictionary, but that is what
> works for me. {8^) Bill Barber
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|