Tom Scales wrote:
>I'm going to have to read the article, as it seems like they're just
>dividing resolution by an arbitrary ppi, such as 300, to make this
>determination. They're not taking into account the ability to upsize and the
>effect of noise.
>
>
Well, they are certainly are making actual prints and comparing them and
are taking noise into account, see page 34.
>I've printed many 24x36 landscapes and macro shots from my 6.1mp camera and
>they're stunning.
>
>
I think their ratings should not be taken as absolutes, but as
standardized tests to produce relative rankings.
Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|