Just thinking about this a bit more, I can imagine that a really stupid
person might decided that since they were out of those wipes made for
babies' bums...
Earl
(Note correct use of apostrophe!)
Andrew Fildes wrote:
>The bog mindles. Forget the stupidity of labelling a motor vehicle
>'not for internal use' - just in case. What possible use is there
>for such a product that could be considered a CRIMINAL offence as
>opposed to ground for tortious action? Go on - I'm just a simple soul
>who isn't familiar with the item but, er, please explain!
>AndrewF
>
>
>On 14/05/2005, at 6:23 AM, Michael R. Collins wrote:
>
>
>
>>Don't confuse it with the Swiffer Wet, though. The DIRECTIONS FOR USE
>>on the that product's package (as sold in Canada) begin as follows:
>>"(for U.S. only): It is in violation of U.S. federal law to use this
>>product in a manner inconsistent with its labeling."
>>
>>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|