Taking advantage of this opportunity . . .
Anyone compared the OM 35~80 to the Tamron 35~80 SP? The latter has
been one of my favo(u)rites for years and I'm wondering how much
'better' the OM could be.
TIA!/ScottGee1
On 5/26/05, Walt Wayman <hiwayman@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Mentioning what I wouldn't sell mine for got me to thinking. I don't read
> the digital stuff all that thoroughly, so I may have missed a tidbit or two
> here and there, but I don't recall any of you pixelheads talking about using
> the analog Zuiko zooms on either an E-Thing or even an off-brand DSLR, like a
> C-Thing. I would've thought the 35-80/2.8 Zuiko would be a natural,
> considering its reputation for quality.
>
> Exactly why is that? Don't any of y'all have one? If someone would like to
> donate an E-Thing for a few months, I could check it out. :-)
>
> Walt
>
> --
> "Anything more than 500 yards from
> the car just isn't photogenic." --
> Edward Weston
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|