Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Erwin Puts on the E1, Four Thirds, Olympus

Subject: [OM] Re: Erwin Puts on the E1, Four Thirds, Olympus
From: Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 15:10:58 -0700
What would the difference be? It seems to me that unless he provides  
concrete reasons for that it just sounds like an assertion or an  
article of faith. Then it is just like the kid's argument. "It is  
too. Is not." What would there be in a body that is different between  
one that takes film lenses and one that does not? I am not aware of  
anything.  I thing it is the design of the wide angle lenses that is  
significant, not the bodies.



Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA




On May 27, 2005, at 2:24 PM, Joel Wilcox wrote:

> I think he is saying that a digital SLR that is designed to  
> accommodate
> film lenses is different from one designed only to use lenses made for
> sensor capture, and he thinks the latter might be better.


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz