Yes, I think the lens must affect WB or exposure somehow. It's just a
little odd that it doesn't seem to affect it in the same way, like one or
two WB levels, each time and in the same direction.
I also thought the bokeh was nice. One thing that is a little hard to get
used to is that you get quite a bit of DOF at f2.8.
Joel W.
At 07:28 AM 5/30/2005 +0800, you wrote:
>As I remember Olympus had firmware update for correcting the exposure of
>50-200 at close distance and firmware update for 40-150's WB error at some
>lighting condition. That means there are possibility that a lens will affect
>the WB or exposure. You may try to fix the color temp. and convert the image
>again to see what happen. BTW, the bokeh of 35-80/2.8 is very good.
>
>C.H.Ling
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Joel Wilcox" <jowilcox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> >I was able to do a little shooting yesterday with the 35-80/2.8 on the
> > E-1. I threw together a web page with some of the images, plus a couple
> > with DZ 14-54 for comparison.
> >
> > I am puzzled by the color as captured through the lens. In cool light it
> > seems too cool, and in warm light a little too warm. Easily corrected in
> > PP.
> >
> > Bokeh characteristics make it into digital capture pretty well, I
> > think. The very last photo was taken with the ZD 14-54 and may surpass
> > the
> > 35-80/2.8 in richness of color in some ways, but the 35-80/2.8 retains a
> > measure of 3-dimensionality that I value the lens for.
> >
> > See what you think:
> >
> > http://soli.inav.net/~jdub/day/ZD-Zu-35-80.html
> >
> > Joel W.
>
>
>==============================================
>List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|