Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>Puttin' my money where my mouth is:
>Here's a shot of a rhododendron blossom done with my A1.
><http://home.comcast.net/~chucknorcutt/wsb/html/view.cgi-photo.html--SiteID-2246544.html
>
><http://home.comcast.net/%7Echucknorcutt/wsb/html/view.cgi-photo.html--SiteID-2246544.html>>
>Here are 320x240 pixel crops from two shots taken of this same blossom.
><http://home.comcast.net/~chucknorcutt/wsb/html/view.cgi-photo.html--SiteID-2246545.html
>
><http://home.comcast.net/%7Echucknorcutt/wsb/html/view.cgi-photo.html--SiteID-2246545.html>>
>
>These are from full resolution 5MP JPEG's. No additional processing has
>been done beyond the default camera settings for sharpening, contrast,
>saturation, etc. One of the shots has a big "speck" stuck on the lens
>about 5-10mm off center. I didn't even make it black. The "speck"
>consists of a triangular piece of bright blue Scotch "Long Mask" masking
>tape approximately 2x3x3 mm. Which one has the "speck" stuck to the
>lens? There are only two images. You've got a 50/50 chance of getting
>it right.
>
Thanks for the great practical example, Chuck!
Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|