Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Why is there no 60mm lens ? Was: 7519772104 reasonable 40f2

Subject: [OM] Re: Why is there no 60mm lens ? Was: 7519772104 reasonable 40f2
From: Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 10:48:42 -0700
Not an easy generalization to make. It all depends on the length of  
the baseline of the rangefinder as well as the magnification. The M3  
was one of the best and had no problem with 135. The many other  
rangefinder cameras on the market had baselines barely long enough to  
accurately focus the lens that was permanently mounted on the camera.



Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA




On Jun 3, 2005, at 9:06 AM, Jeff Keller wrote:

> The M2: 35/50/90 was probably a good kit. Longer focal lengths were  
> wanted
> but don't the RF cameras start to have problems at about 135mm?


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz