Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Why is there no 60mm lens ? Was: 7519772104 reasonable 40f2

Subject: [OM] Re: Why is there no 60mm lens ? Was: 7519772104 reasonable 40f2
From: "Piers Hemy" <piers@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2005 00:00:19 +0100
And further back still would have been the Carl Zeiss 58/2 Biotar which was
copied by KMZ for the Zenith SLRs and named Helios 44 - deerived from a pre
WWII Planar, I believe.

--
Piers 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Moose
Sent: 04 June 2005 22:32
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: Why is there no 60mm lens ? Was: 7519772104 reasonable
40f2

Wayne Harridge wrote:

>>There were a few 58mm standard lenses around, especially in the fast 
>>glass category (Canon FD?) AndrewF
>>    
>>
>
>Also a Rokkor 58/1.2 I believe.
>
Going back a bit further, the fast normal lens for the Topcon Super-D 
was 58mm, as I recall.

Moose


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz