Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Why is there no 60mm lens ? Was: 7519772104 reasonable 40f2

Subject: [OM] Re: Why is there no 60mm lens ? Was: 7519772104 reasonable 40f2
From: Earl Dunbar <edunbar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 22:20:23 -0400
That would be ZeniT, not ZeniTH, correct?

Earl

Piers Hemy wrote:

>And further back still would have been the Carl Zeiss 58/2 Biotar which was
>copied by KMZ for the Zenith SLRs and named Helios 44 - deerived from a pre
>WWII Planar, I believe.
>
>--
>Piers 
> 
>-----Original Message-----
>From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
>Of Moose
>Sent: 04 June 2005 22:32
>To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [OM] Re: Why is there no 60mm lens ? Was: 7519772104 reasonable
>40f2
>
>Wayne Harridge wrote:
>
>  
>
>>>There were a few 58mm standard lenses around, especially in the fast 
>>>glass category (Canon FD?) AndrewF
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>Also a Rokkor 58/1.2 I believe.
>>
>>    
>>
>Going back a bit further, the fast normal lens for the Topcon Super-D 
>was 58mm, as I recall.
>
>Moose
>  
>


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz