Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Why is there no 60mm lens ? Was: 7519772104 reasonable 40f2

Subject: [OM] Re: Why is there no 60mm lens ? Was: 7519772104 reasonable 40f2
From: "Piers Hemy" <piers@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2005 19:35:06 +0100
Over here, curiously, it was always marketed as a ZENITH - there being no TV
manufacturer of that name in these parts to complain, but what you got was
(definitely) engraved ZENIT.  Though the only examples I have seen in the
past 15 years have been (defiantly) engraved 3EHUT.

--
Piers 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Earl Dunbar
Sent: 05 June 2005 03:20
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: Why is there no 60mm lens ? Was: 7519772104 reasonable
40f2


That would be ZeniT, not ZeniTH, correct?

Earl

Piers Hemy wrote:

>And further back still would have been the Carl Zeiss 58/2 Biotar which 
>was copied by KMZ for the Zenith SLRs and named Helios 44 - deerived 
>from a pre WWII Planar, I believe.
>
>--
>Piers
> 

--snip


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz