Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Why is there no 60mm lens ? Was: 7519772104 reasonable 40f2

Subject: [OM] Re: Why is there no 60mm lens ? Was: 7519772104 reasonable 40f2
From: "Dave Bell" <david.w.bell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2005 20:31:52 +0100
ZenitH in UK originally ... once had a Zenith E with 58mm Helios .. now have
Zenit EM somewhere also with 58mm Helios
Also have a Lomo LC-A badged Zenith
Dave

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Earl Dunbar" <edunbar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2005 3:20 AM
Subject: [OM] Re: Why is there no 60mm lens ? Was: 7519772104 reasonable
40f2


>
> That would be ZeniT, not ZeniTH, correct?
>
> Earl
>
> Piers Hemy wrote:
>
> >And further back still would have been the Carl Zeiss 58/2 Biotar which
was
> >copied by KMZ for the Zenith SLRs and named Helios 44 - deerived from a
pre
> >WWII Planar, I believe.
> >
> >--
> >Piers
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf
> >Of Moose
> >Sent: 04 June 2005 22:32
> >To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
> >Subject: [OM] Re: Why is there no 60mm lens ? Was: 7519772104 reasonable
> >40f2
> >
> >Wayne Harridge wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>>There were a few 58mm standard lenses around, especially in the fast
> >>>glass category (Canon FD?) AndrewF
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>Also a Rokkor 58/1.2 I believe.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >Going back a bit further, the fast normal lens for the Topcon Super-D
> >was 58mm, as I recall.
> >
> >Moose
> >
> >
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz