Kevin Radloff wrote:
>On 6/6/05, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>>It's both fun to post some of my pics on the web and quite wonderful to
>>see what other listees post.
>>
>>However, there are some subjects that just aren't done justice in a
>>reduced JPEG. I've noticed it in some posts by others, where I imagine
>>the original to be wonderful, but some parts of the web image just
>>aren't quite right.
>>
>>
>
>Have you tried playing with different combinations of sharpening
>before and after resizing? That can help, although landscape shots are
>very hard to get right with a very limited number of pixels.
>
>
Sure, but the permutations are endless. If you have any pointers, I'd
love to hear them. I did later try less sharpening in the downsizing
process, then a little LCE to the display size image on a different
shot, and I think it is an improvement, but not as much as I would like.
The big problem, as you say, is just not enough pixels to resolve the
detail. Some things come through just fine. Others just get "funny" in
one way or another. I think it is related to the size of the texture
elements relative to the size of the final image.
Moose
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|