Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: [OT] English Language misuse !

Subject: [OM] Re: [OT] English Language misuse !
From: hiwayman@xxxxxxx (Walt Wayman)
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 17:33:46 +0000
It's been considered to be either.  It's a matter of context, kind of like 
"y'all'd" can be the contraction either of "y'all would" or "y'all had."

Walt

--
"Anything more than 500 yards from 
the car just isn't photogenic." -- 
Edward Weston

 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: ScottGee1 <scottgee1@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Not to belabo(u)r this . . .
> 
> Is "it's" correct for "it has"?  I thought "it's" is used only for "it is".
> 
> Inquiring minds want to know . . .
> 
> Once again, I reach for my Olympus binoculars to search for that
> distant shore know as On Topic.  ;o)
> 
> ScottGee1
> 
> 
> On 6/7/05, Jeff Keller <jeff-keller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> >  It's lost its cap.
> > -jeff
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Vlad the Impaler
> > >
> > >
> > > Its not quite clear to me what your trying to say here? Do
> > > you mean like "my lens has lost it's cap"?
> > >
==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz