Depends on how you resize it, here are two samples of multi-level
re-sampling (5-6 steps) with PS:
900x1199
http://www.accura.com.hk/P21a.jpg
600x800
http://www.accura.com.hk/P21b.jpg
They look very good to me.
Also, forgot to mention the original file, it was from E-1 RAW, converted
with Olympus RAW at JPEG standard quality mode, no noise reduction.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "AG Schnozz" <agschnozz@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> I find that the original file size holds very well, but resizing
> seems to exasperate the high ISO noise. Case in point would be
> my Cubs game photos. Resized for the gallery (25% size
> reduction), makes the images look pretty noisy. However in
> print they appear pretty fine, indeed.
>
> In reality, I'm getting unprocessed ISO 1600 shots blown up to
> 8x10 that look pretty much like print film ISO 400, but with
> greater resolution. Throw a little Noiseware at the file and
> noise is a non-issue in print.
>
> Could I stand cleaner performance? Of course.
>
> AG
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
