Hmmm . . . these (and almost all of my) prints were made by a
commercial Noritsu digital printer on Fuji Crystal Archive paper.
Since you mention Web display I'm now wondering how the compression
that is applied to reduce file size for quick loading affects noise
and clarity. Of course, that isn't the case in my example as I'm
using full size files directly from the camera.
My goal is to get past the tech talk and deal with what I (and my
clients) can actually see.
Thanks!/ScottGee1
On 6/14/05, Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Two thoughts.
>
> There is ink spread with even the best ink jet printer. It covers a
> wealth of noise problems. That is one reason that the obsession over
> noise is a bit irrelevant if your only goal is printing.
>
> As more and more people are showing their pictures these days on the
> web or on a lap top noise is more relevant because it is more
> visible, especially on the sharper LCDs at least at 100 percent. I
> don't understand why someone would get more noise in the reduced size
> for a computer display since my experience and plenty of feedback
> from others is that the noise gets less apparent in size reductions.
> Maybe some anti-aliasing going on?
>
>
>
> Winsor
> Long Beach, California, USA
>
>
>
>
> On Jun 14, 2005, at 10:55 AM, ScottGee1 wrote:
>
> > Bottom line, it makes me wonder if the Internet, in its screen based
> > myopia, has spawned a whole lot of intense criticism about something
> > that is a minor issue to those of us who enjoy prints.
> >
> > Maybe all of this has been discussed before and if so, my apologies
> > for the redundancy.
> >
> > Your thoughts?/ScottGee1
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|