AG,
The E-1 also seems to "suck pond water" when it comes to noise levels
at higher ISO settings though seems to be better than the E-300. In
the real world, has this been a problem for you? Between the Ca*on
350D and the E-300, at the moment, I'm leaning more toward the 350D
though I wonder if I'll regret not having the auto sensor cleaning.
BTW, do these things come with a flash card or is that another initial
expense?
Richard
On 7/16/05, AG Schnozz <agschnozz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > The highest mark was 95%; obtained by two cameras only. The
> > Canon EOS-1DS Mk2 @ £6,000 and the (wait for it...) Olympus
> > E-1 @ £735.
>
> Specification wise, the E-1 sucks pond water. The E-1 also does
> a lousy job on res-charts. Fortunately, the world doesn't have
> res charts in every photo.
>
> > E-1 users take heart.
>
> I guess you could say that we E-1 users don't really care what
> anybody writes as we know the truth. :) In a way, we're hoping
> for some really bad reviews so we can pick up a bargain E-1.
>
> Doesn't happen, though. Ain't no bargain E-1s out there.
>
> That should say something.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|