Moose wrote:
> However, let me propose something. You, or anybody, choose the
> combination of iso, printer, etc., etc. that gives the noise
> results that you find minimally just acceptable. Then assume
> that I offer to give the same results at twice the iso, or
> four times the iso, without any other trade-offs. Are you
> really going to say that makes no difference?...
You do bring up an excellent point, Moose. Frankly, I wouldn't
mind having a 20D for some of the features, speed,
imaging-noise, etc. But the "film" has a different look than
what I want.
AG
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|