Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: The Gimp file sizes

Subject: [OM] Re: The Gimp file sizes
From: Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 18:23:07 +0100
Thanks Frugal, but you quickly reached the edge of my  
understanding ;-).  I shall stick with Graphic Converter or PS,  
albeit now knowing that the quality levels might bear little relation  
to each other.

Chris
~~ >-)-
C M I Barker
Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.
+44 (0)7092 251126
www.threeshoes.co.uk
homepage.mac.com/zuiko


On 17 Jul 2005, at 15:22, Andrew Dacey wrote:

> As for sub-sampling, if memory serves, that's a method where the
> chroma values of adjacent pixels are averaged in order to reduce the
> file size. At a setting of 1x1 there should be none (you're averaging
> a grid of 1 pixel by 1 pixel). A common setting (at lower jpeg quality
> settings) is 2x2 sub-sampling. Normally, each pixel would have 24-bits
> of data (8 bits each for Luminance, Chroma A and Chroma B) so for a
> 2x2 grid you would use 96 bits of data (4 x 24). When sub-sampling,
> you keep the luminance value for each pixel but only store 1 chroma
> value for A and B for the whole grid. This results in each 2x2 grid
> only needing 48 bits of data (4 x 8 + 8 + 8). For images with lots of
> solid colour this is a great way to get small files (50% savings right
> there) but for images with lots of fine detail the results are usually
> not good.
>


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz