Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: [photos] OT (taken with digital camera)

Subject: [OM] Re: [photos] OT (taken with digital camera)
From: Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 19:37:03 +1000
The 24-85mm was bundled with the IX in a special box and the lens was  
claimed to be a good match, being a 40-115mm (approx.) equivalent. It  
WAS the same lens and I used it on a 35mm body too. The IX felt like  
an attachement on the lens but it was a pretty and nicely balanced  
outfit. When I sold them, having lost faith in the APS system, I sold  
them separately as by this time the lens was worth more than the  
body. There was a consumer grade 22-55mm lens (I think) rather than  
18-55mm but that was also full frame. I'm surprised that there has  
been no digital version of the IX as it was a very neat design.
The Nikon Pronea and Minolta Vectis lenses were APS image size I  
think and may the basis for new digital lenses. But Canon held hard  
to the 'full frame' lens for a long time, partly because they had an  
advantage in designing a wide throat and shallow body for the switch  
to EOS auto-focus in the late eighties. That's why they can do faster  
lenses cheaper and why almost anything fits them with an appropriate  
and simple adapter.
There was a claim that the 24-85mm  had been upped in resolution for  
use on APS as it appeared as a new lens at the same time as the  
bodies - and it was 'acceptable' given the greater enlargement ratio.  
On a 35mm body it is far superior to the standard nasty consumer  
zooms but it is four times the price as well - I recommend it to  
beginners. However, if you used the panoramic feature on the EOS IX,  
then the limitations were shown as the enlargement ratio was far  
greater on a 10x4 print of a section of the APS frame.
AndrewF


On 18/07/2005, at 12:38 AM, Andrew Dacey wrote:

>
> On 7/17/05, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>> Well, I happen to have a 25-85/3.5-4.5, but not a 24-70. Are you sure
>> about the APS bit; that it is the same lens? Why would it then cover
>> 35mm? I also find it hard to believe that they put such a large  
>> lens on
>> an APS camera.
>>
>
> I thought it was the 18-55 that shipped with the Digital Rebel that
> had come from the Canon IX bundle?
>
>
>


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz