Hello everybody, I'm new to the list.
I want a 28mm Zuiko and really like the idea of a F/2.0 lens, but many of
the opinions I see posted talk about the F/3.5 lens having better "pop" in
use. I'd be using it mainly for landscapes from F5.6-11. While I would
welcome the brighter viewfinder image from the F/2 lens, it's the final
quality I'm most interested in. Looking for opinions from someone who has
used both. I know ther is also a F/2.8 version but I hear very little good
comments about that one.
Thanks,
Paul
-----Original Message-----
From: Fernando Gonzalez Gentile [mailto:fgnzalez@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2005 5:55 PM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: Hoods, and the 21/3.5 in particular [was old hoods
justfade away]
on 16/07/2005 04:09, Moose at olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, wrote:
> I don't have an old Oly 49 mm linear polarizer, but I'll bet
> the 21/3.5 hood will fit over it and fit properly on the lens.
Do you mean slipping-on the hood with an Oly linear pol. screwed-on?
My experience is to try to slip-on a 50 mm - 35/2.8 mm hood with the Oly
pol. screwed, and it's not possible.
>
> Finally, a personal preference comment, to balance all the folks who
> dislike slip-on hoods. Slip-ons are my favorites. Now that's partly
> because they will work best with a filter or filters, as explained
> above. But mostly it's because the let me put the lens cap on with the
> hood on! I can't believe others don't also find this a big plus.
Absolutely.
Regards,
Fernando
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|