It's been a long time since I've used my 300, but the shots I remember
were b&w, so the chroma problem wouldn't have been evident. But I did
like the lens overall and the bokeh. It was pretty sharp.
Earl
Moose wrote:
>Andrew L Wendelborn wrote:
>
>
>
>>Interested in opinions.
>>
>>How does it compare (image quality wise) with
>>
>> i) 300/4.5 + 2XA
>>
>>
>>
>>
>Almost forgot. My TOPE 20 shot was taken with the 300/4.5 and 2xA. The
>nature of the shot is such that I'm afraid it doesn't tell you much
>about the lens qualities you may be concerned about.
>
>It's a much larger and more unwieldy lens than the mirrors, but has
>normal highlights and one may adjust the aperture for DOF.
>
>Moose
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|