Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Why not digital? (was: Confession time...)

Subject: [OM] Re: Why not digital? (was: Confession time...)
From: Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:16:27 -0700
And there is the Pentax *IST DS or DL with their 43mm 1.9. If  
concerned with a similar angle of view as the Oly with pancake, every  
manufacturer makes a 28mm lens that is equivalent in view about 40mm  
on a digital. The low priced Canon digital SLRs are both about the  
same size as an OM. You could even plunk a tiny Oly 21mm on an E-300  
with an adaptor.



Winsor
Long Beach, California, USA




On Jul 27, 2005, at 10:54 AM, Daniel Sepke wrote:

> The closest you'll get size wise is the Epson R-D1 and VC 35/2.5  
> pancake. Of
> course not in everyone's price bracket and it is a RF camera. Close  
> but....
>
> Dan S.
>
> From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On  
> Behalf
> Of R.Jackson
> Subject: [OM] Re: Why not digital? (was: Confession time...)
>
> It would be nice to have something comparable to an OM with a pancake
> lens in the digital marketplace.


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz