Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: olympus Digest V2 #210

Subject: [OM] Re: olympus Digest V2 #210
From: Stephen Scharf <scharfsj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 23:01:36 -0700
>From: "R. Jackson" <jackson.robert.r@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: [OM] Re: Film pro goes digi...
>Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:55:59 -0700
>
>
>Are you saying that nobody makes a wide-angle lens that doesn't have 
>light fall-off and softness in the corners? Didn't one of the big 
>companies spend $20 million or so researching three or four wide-
>angle lenses just a couple of years ago? I seem to recall reading 
>something about it...

No, I am not. As CH as pointed out, the wide-angle zooms of many 
manufacturers exhibit light-fall off and softness in the corners 
when shot at larger apertures, not just Canon's. What I am saying is 
that they are not "weak" lenses because of this. I'm also saying that 
the  problem on a 1Ds full frame sensor is more noticeable because 
the 1Ds full frame digital sensor has more resolution than 35 mm 
film. It is markedly less of a problem on a 1.3X or 1.6X sensor. My 
point still holds, the Canon 70-200/2.8L, 300/2.8L and 500/4 L IS 
rank amongst the best lenses anyone has made at any time.

-Stephen.

>


-- 


2001 CBR600F4i - Fantastic!

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz