Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: New Base for OM Lenses

Subject: [OM] Re: New Base for OM Lenses
From: "C.H.Ling" <chling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 07:38:25 +0800
Sometimes seeing is not believing, you have to use it and test it yourself, 
they are heavily biased, I never trust them.

C.H.Ling

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Chuck Norcutt" <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx>

> You apparently haven't read the article.  The 20D is not mentioned since
> the article was written 2 years before it was announced.  The comment
> about the 20D is my own interpolation of the data.  Please take the time
> to read it before knocking down the conclusion.
>
> The article compares output from the 1Ds (11 MP) to Fuji Velvia rated at
> ISO 40 and scanned on an Isomet 405HR drum scanner as well as a 3200 ppi
> Imacon.  From the images presented the 1Ds image is clearly superior to
> the Imacon scan and fully equal to the drum scan.
>
> The images are there for you to see.  Either he lied or the 1Ds at 11 MP
> is the equal of a 6x7 negative at far less cost.  It took the high cost
> drum scan to equal (not beat) the digital image.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
> http://www.chucknorcutt.com/
>



==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz