In my opinion would be worth to consider variability between samples,
C*n*n QC isn't excellent, and the probably try to keep up to the great
request the have.
I had the chance to try two 70/200 f/4 samples, one was very good, the
other was a dog.
Sure, a zoom with a lot of lenses, moved ultrafast from ultrasonic
motors...
Precision cannot be that good.
Alfredo
On Aug 25, 2005, at 3:59 AM, chling wrote:
> I always check multiple sources before I comment. I have friends that
> have/had both and they all said 17-40 is better especially for
> digital. You can also check here:
>
> http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/lenses/canon-17-40.shtml
>
> At the wide end the 17-40 was a winner, at the long end it was same as
> my experience, a little poorer.
>
> C.H.Ling
>
> -------Original Message-------
>> From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: [OM] Re: OT: 5D Sample Images
>> Sent: 25 Aug '05 01:13
>>
>> The Pop Photo test of the 16-35 shows it to be a better performer
>> than
>> the 17-40.
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
>>
>> C.H.Ling wrote:
>>> I'm sure the final print will not be better and of course if you
>>> view it
>>> from distance you may not see it. I'm intereted to know which is the
>>> best
>>> superwide zoom from C*non. All I see and heard the 17-40/4 is the
>>> best from
>>> them, I also had one in the past. Actually, they only have the
>>> 16-35/2.8 to
>>> compare, it is not as good and the older 17-35 is even poorer.
>>
>>
>> ==============================================
>> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>> List
>> nannies:
>> olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>> ==============================================
>>
> -------Original Message-------
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
___________________________________
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB
http://mail.yahoo.it
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|