Yeah...I could do that. The thrill of shooting film through my Oly
bodies and it winding up in a motion picture is kinda gone then, but
it would be way more practical. The dust and grain and all that
doesn't really bother me. I kind of like the lo-fi look. I'm not
boiling my film stock in berry juice or soaking it in urine (like
some of my more "artistic" brethren) to get the "organic" look, but
I'm mixing Super-8, 16mm and 35mm throughout this film. I kind of
like the idea of mixing in some 35mm still sequences and in places
where a permit to shoot mopic is unlikely I figure I can always get
away with carrying around an OM.
On Aug 31, 2005, at 8:01 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> You could buy a nice digi thing for the price of a scanner and the
> processing all those rolls of film... not to mention your labor even
> with the uncut rolls. Dust, dust, dust, yecchh! Or, consider renting
> the digi thing if you're going to take these images over a short
> period
> of time.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|