Yes, I feel them the same way.
From what I have read about his work, I often studies the habitat of
the animals and insects before photographing and makes large use of
reflective umbrellas left in place.
Given the focal lenghts gave for the photographs a flash seems out of
question to me, even if I would'nt dare to call me an expert in the use
of flash.
This requires a lot of patience, though.
Wonderful work indeed, he used a E-20 before the E-1 came out.
On Sep 1, 2005, at 3:19 PM, Andrew Dacey wrote:
>
> On 9/1/05, alfredo pagliano <alfredo_pag@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> What about the wonderful work of Japanese enthomologist and
>> photographer Kazuo Unno?
>>
>> I'd been admiring it from a long time, he now shoots with E-1 and
>> E-300, though.
>
> Just for those interested, I did a quick search and found this:
>
> http://www.olympus-esystem.jp/gallery_e/unno_k/
>
> Beautiful stuff but there's something about the 2 bird shots (001 and
> 003) that seems odd to me, can't quite put my finger on it. I feel it
> more with 001 than 003. There's something about the bird that just
> doesn't seem right, it almost like the "cut out" effect you see with
> fill flash some times but it doesn't look like he used fill here.
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
___________________________________
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB
http://mail.yahoo.it
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|