On Saturday 10 September 2005 18:13, Skip Williams wrote:
> That camera is, IMO, not a replacement for an OM body with a 40/2.
>
> But they are nice cameras. All the cameras you mention are nice, the RD,
> with it's faster lens is more versatile, but larger.
Here's a sample of what the 40mm f/1.7 lens on the 35RD can do:
http://members.shaw.ca/parz/SharonAtBreadAndCircuses.jpg
warning - 1 megabyte file
--
Parzival Herzog
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
