I've got the hood, which still looks like new, and the box. And, of course,
the lens to go with it. Sorry, Dan, but I'll be keeping both.
Two of my TOPE shots, "Water" and "Machines and Tools," were taken with a 21/2.
They're not great scans, having been made before I got the more gooder Minolta
5400, but feel free to take a peek to see what you're missing. :-)
http://www.tope.nl/tope_show_entry.php?event=10&pic=8
http://www.tope.nl/tope_show_entry.php?event=18&pic=7
Happy hunting.
Walt
--
"Anything more than 500 yards from
the car just isn't photogenic." --
Edward Weston
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: "danrich7" <danrich7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This one was new in box, very rare
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of NSURIT@xxxxxxx
> Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 8:19 PM
> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [OM] Re: WTB 21 f/2 or 18 3.5
>
>
>
> In a message dated 9/16/2005 9:59:54 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
> danrich7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
> I saw a 21 f2 hood last week on the Fred Maranda page that went for $175.
> Wow!
>
>
>
>
> Unbelievable. Wonder what a like new in box one would bring. BB
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|