Oops. Wasn't finished.
Also like iron4025
Generally, no noticable noise at 800 ASA, but perhaps that was cleaned
up? Somehow I don't think you would purchase a camera that didn't
deal with noise from the outset.
The light and color seems a little "off" throughout most of the
cloister shots. Probably just the difficult circumstances, possibly
white balance issues, and maybe AdobeRGB too. All images look better
in PS than in the browser.
Most images, including my favorites, look like they would improve with
some PP, or more PP, especially in terms of color balance and
contrast.
I have no idea what camera. Not a Lumix I'll wager, but I haven't a clue.
Joel W.
On 9/25/05, Joel Wilcox <jfwilcox@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> These are some that I like a lot:
>
> clois1025, 1057, 1069
>
>
> On 9/25/05, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I'm of the opinion, possibly inaccurate, that a lot of what is said
> > about cameras is based on ideas, prejudices and opinions, often at least
> > partly from others, and not too much on actual results.
> >
> > So I'm posting two series of pictures without saying what camera made
> > the images. PS won't put EXIF data in the captions, but it is there in
> > the image files, but without the camera ID. So exposure data, etc. is
> > available.
> >
> > I'm curious what you folks think of the images in two ways. First, I
> > really like some of the images, and would be interested in comments,
> > criticism, etc.of subject, composition, and so forth.
> >
> > Second, what do you think about the quality of the camera that produced
> > them? There are some difficult subjects, particularly due to low light
> > levels. Any guesses on the camera? I purchased it without saying
> > anything on the list and gave it its first workout on my trip.
> >
> > The first set is images shot at The Cloisters, a group of medieval
> > buildings and bits and pieces imported from Europe and assembled by the
> > Rockefellers into a museum at the North end of Manhatten. A lovely place
> > set in a park It houses the Met's medieval collection. Photography is
> > allowed, but no flash. When I saw the flash of another camera, I took a
> > chance and shot one myself, eliciting a thunderous response from a
> > guard. I like the non-flash pic better, I think
> > <http://galleries.moosemystic.net/Cloisters/>.
> >
> > The first 14 images of the second set are random shots on the way from
> > Camden to and then in Fryeburg, ME. The rest were taken in the woods in
> > the White Mountain National Forest on a heavily overcast day with some
> > drizzle. Again, there is one example of a subject with and without
> > flash. Many of the other subjects would be equally ugly with flash
> > <http://galleries.moosemystic.net/Iron4/>.
> >
> > I've included a few full pixel samples, too.
> >
> > Moose
> >
> >
> > ==============================================
> > List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> > List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> > ==============================================
> >
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|