Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Shots again the E-500

Subject: [OM] Re: Shots again the E-500
From: ScottGee1 <scottgee1@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 09:12:46 -0400
Hey!  Why do you need a "good" VF anyway?  AF is perfect so all the
pix are in focus anyway!

Besides, it saves the manufacturers money so they can sell the cams to
us for lower prices.

Fussy, fussy, fussy . . .  :-?

ScottGee1


On 10/26/05, Geilfuss Charles <Charles.Geilfuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Ali,
>        Won't know until the E-500 is in hand. I have compared the E-300 and 
> R*bel XT side by side and I thought the viewfinders were comparable. If 
> Dpreview is to be believed then the E-500 has a dimmer viewfinder than the 
> E-300. Askey seemed pretty disappointed in the finder in what he thought was 
> otherwise a very good camera.
>
> Charlie
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx]On
> Behalf Of Ali
> Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 10:41 PM
> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [OM] Re: Shots again the E-500
>
>
>
> I checked out a Can*n Rebel XT at Office Max the other day. The
> viewfinder is certainly smaller than let's say an OM-2N. Is the E-500
> viewfinder going much smaller than the Rebel XT?
>
> - Ali
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz