Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Have you noticed

Subject: [OM] Re: Have you noticed
From: "Piers Hemy" <piers@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 23:41:59 -0000
My answer would be the same.

And getting back to the OP, yes, I *did* notice the number of E-1 entries. 

--
Piers 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Moose
Sent: 08 November 2005 23:07
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: Have you noticed

Willie Wonka wrote:

>I was wandering...
>If I can submit to the TOPE gallery a picture with a camera that fits
non-OM Zuikos.
>  
>
My answer would be no.

>After all DZ's are not OM Z's and I think I saw some pix that utilized the
OM adapter, but made with CWNMN, I might be wrong.
>  
>
Yes, you did see a shot taken with a non Oly DSLR. However, the lens used
was a Zuiko. It seems logically legit to me, as many, many shots with non
Zuiko lenses on OM bodies are in there, including mine.

Non-Zuiko lens in OM mount on non-Oly body via adapter, seems to me to be
pushing outside the limits. If that's legit, then I claim the rignt to
submit shots from the Fuji F10 using Oly "film", an Olympus xD card.

Moose


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz