No trace of 180/2.5 or 80-200/2.8 as AF lenses but confirmation that they
were both MF Adaptall mounted here:
http://www.tamron.co.jp/en/data/lenses/list_dis.html
But 300/2.8 AF is current (but definitely OT!) as Model 360E and 360EE
http://www.tamron.co.jp/en/data/af-lens/360e.html
http://www.tamron.co.jp/en/data/af-lens/360ee.html and a 180/3.5 AF is also
current http://www.tamron.co.jp/en/data/af-lens/b01.html
--
Piers
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Jeff Keller
Sent: 05 December 2005 16:39
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: Wildlife Photographer of the Year (OT)
The charcoal grey 300/2.8 was definitely made in both adaptall and AF
mounts. I'm not sure about the green 300/2.8. I've only seen the green 400/4
in adaptall mount.
I believe both the 180/2.5 and 80-200/2.8 were made in both AF and adaptall
mounts, but I'm far from certain.
-jeff
----Original Message Follows----
From: Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Yup!
Moose
Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>Just to be clear, are these Adaptall lenses?
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|