This morning I nearly bought the 50-200 zoom for the digital series, but I
choked on the price a little. (Try financing this hobby on a graduate
student salary sometime ;)
The 40-150 zoom is a much cheaper alternative. I'm just wondering if anyone
here has used it, and whether they are pleased with the images it produces.
Taking into account the multiplication factor, it's a longer lens than I
would normally use. So, if the images are passable, it may be alright for a
seldom-used lens.
What I'd really like is a series of lens tests similar to those done by Gary
Reese for the OM lenses, but for now a few opinions would do!
Cheers,
Robert Swier
Toronto
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|