Hey, not so fast. There's my 1940 Ford Deluxe convertible, my 1957
DeSoto 2 door coupe with big hemi, my 1964 Jaguar XKE convertible
(drophead coupe to some), my 1973 Pontiac Grand Am with 400 cubic inches
and, of course, my OM-1 and OM-2's.
But, I have to admit that my 1999 Chrysler LHS is a far more comfortable
automobile than any of the earlier ones and I wouldn't be surprised if
it could out corner the XKE. And I'd have to get rid of the Grand Am
after passing the first gas station.
Ergonomically, the digitals are far worse than the OM's but they sure do
make pictures a lot faster.
Chuck Norcutt
Winsor Crosby wrote:
> I think you are just experiencing progress. Can't think of many
> technological items from the 70's or 80's I would like to go back to
> whether a camera, a television, a car or a computer except for
> antiquarian interest. Your feeling will last until you get your own
> newer camera. :-)
>
>
>
> Winsor
> Long Beach, California, USA
>
>
>
>
> On Dec 6, 2005, at 7:17 AM, swisspace wrote:
>
>
>>With my wife going to the hospital every day and the preference to
>>update the website frequently I don't get to see my E1 much these
>>days,
>>in fact I have to book it in advance and give a good reason ;-) -
>>sooo
>>I find myself back to carrying an OM around, the problem is I miss the
>>instant gratification of seeing an image etc, has anyone gone through
>>this experience and does it last long.
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|