Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Tempted by the E-500

Subject: [OM] Re: Tempted by the E-500
From: "Piers Hemy" <piers@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 12:31:56 -0000
Whoa, hold on!  Those were actually Simon Worby's own words about four
months ago, which have come back to haunt him!

I wouldn't want to claim credit where it isn't due.

And they have been pinned to *my* desktop ever since he first posted them. 

--
Piers 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Wayne Culberson
Sent: 07 December 2005 12:14
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: Tempted by the E-500



> Piers Hemy wrote:
>
 > 1. Obsolescence & depreciation.
 > 2. No proper manual focussing.
 > 3. Quality of photos.
 > 4. Size of equipment.
 > 5. Cost of lenses.
 > 6. Investment in film cameras and lenses.
 > 7. Battery life.
 > 8. Data storage / backup / obsolescence concerns.
 > 9. Too many buttons for an old fart like you.
 >
 > See, that wasn't so hard, now was it?

Thanks Piers. I may print this off and laminate it on the top of my desk, or
tack it to the edge of my computer monitor :-) Wayne


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz