Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: [Photo] Cold sea

Subject: [OM] Re: [Photo] Cold sea
From: Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 16:40:27 -0800
Johan Malmstrom wrote:

>Lighthouses only purpose seems to be be photogenic. No need for the light as
>GPS has become ubiquitous.
>  
>
It would appear that you have never spent any time navigating at sea, 
particularly in coastal waters in poor weather.

The key to safety is redundancy. A GPS unit can fail to operate, or 
worse, give wrong results. Sure, it it the major tool, but any time one 
is in costal waters with hidden obstacles, poor weather, etc., visual 
fix location and radar ranging location are essential for safety. Also, 
in harbors and harbor approaches, esp. at night, things can become quite 
visually confusing. Lights and markers set up sight lines to keep one on 
the correct heading directly, without reference to chart, GPS, etc. this 
can be very important in busy, complex areas and in dark places.

Just knowing that keeping two lights ligned up as I steer will keep me 
in the channel and that there are another pair at the turning makes safe 
navigation easier.

US light houses have been automated, but still are all maintained. And 
they still use aural fog signals. I was just listening to one a few 
weeks ago in Maine. Did I mention that it was foggy in mid afternoon? 
<http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/MPhotos/OwlsHead/>

Back when LORAN gave pretty good positions at sea, the navigator still 
took at least two sightings a day with sextant. There is still something 
about the sea and its weather that will sometimes defeat almost any 
means of determining position on rare occasions. So the wise navigator 
always uses as many as are available.

Moose


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz