The scratches and lines that are not parallel to the edges of the film
indicate there was rough handling of film during processing. Large
white specs and blobs are dust resting on film during scanning.
___________________________________
John Hermanson
Camtech Photo Services, Inc.
21 South Lane, Huntington NY 11743
631-424-2121 | Olympus OM Service since 1977
www.zuiko.com | omtech1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Remove 'spam' when writing
Komtanoo Pinpimai wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As the previous thread of my defect OM-1n, today, the sky was 80%
> bright, I went out to test the camera against the Sunny 16 rule. I
> adjusted its ASA to 125, shutter speed=125, but the F was turned out
> to be 8 instead of 16. Was it normal, because it's a little bit cloudy
> ?
>
> Then, I shot a roll of cheap negative ISO100 film (walgreen studio 35)
> and it was developped by the 1-hour-photo of a Walgreen. I told them
> to develop only, no print, no cut, and I did scan it myself, here are
> the pictures (my scanner is set not to apply any correction to the
> image):
>
> http://rrboard.orisma.com/tmp/xxx/1.jpg
> http://rrboard.orisma.com/tmp/xxx/2.jpg
> http://rrboard.orisma.com/tmp/xxx/3.jpg
> http://rrboard.orisma.com/tmp/xxx/4.jpg
> http://rrboard.orisma.com/tmp/xxx/5.jpg
> http://rrboard.orisma.com/tmp/xxx/6.jpg
>
> You can see that these pictures have many defects in which I made red
> circles around them. There are 2 major types of defects:
>
> 1. look like dried drops of liquid which should be made by walgreen
> 2. horizontal white lines -- I'm not sure how they appeared, maybe
> walgreen or maybe my OM ? Is is possible that these lines were done
> the camera ?
>
> Moreover, the pictures look under-exposed with BLUE tone. I don't know
> why they're usually blue when shooting negative with this 1n:
>
> negative fuji ISO400
> http://rrboard.orisma.com/tmp/xxx/7.jpg
> http://rrboard.orisma.com/tmp/xxx/8.jpg
> http://rrboard.orisma.com/tmp/xxx/9.jpg
>
> negative konica ISO800 outdated
> http://rrboard.orisma.com/tmp/xxx/10.jpg
> http://rrboard.orisma.com/tmp/xxx/11.jpg
>
> this one is from the same roll of the konica but it's not that blue:
> http://rrboard.orisma.com/tmp/xxx/12.jpg
>
> hm.., after looking these pics serveral times, I think I come to a
> conclusion -- they're usually blue because I usually shoot the blue
> things like the sky or river? why is that ?
>
> BTW, if you remember my previous thread on the peculiar behavior of
> this OM -- it always produces very over-exposed when shooting with
> positive film + xprocess development + in the bright sky, however,
> it's never happened with negative film.
>
> http://static.flickr.com/20/71957949_d91dbfd506_o.jpg (cloudy)
> http://static.flickr.com/20/71958077_f9dbe46005_o.jpg (sunny)
> http://static.flickr.com/20/71958225_551cf67414_o.jpg (sunny)
>
> ..my undeterministic om-1n..
> -kem
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
-- No attachments (even text) are allowed --
-- Type: text/x-vcard
-- File: omtech1.vcf
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
