[OM] Re: was Spiratone....Now 14-54 F2.8

[oly-zooko]

OOps..my bad...it is the 14-45mm f3.5/5.6 to the 14-54mm f2.8/3.5 that I am 
comparing. 

Thanks for the heads up. I have the kit lens, however a faster and brighter 
lens would 
certainly be better.



On 26 Dec 2005 at 20:20, Jeff Keller wrote:

> 
> If you're comparing the 14-45mm f3.5/5.6 to the 14-54mm f2.8/3.5 the thing 
> that was most noticeable to me was the barrel distortion at the 14mm end for 
> the cheaper lens.
> 
> It could be argued that the 14-45 is good enough that it's not worth 
> spending additional money on the 14-54 but IMO if you have neither get the 
> 14-54.
> 
> -jeff
> 
> ----Original Message Follows----
> From: oly-zooko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> Seems like I am NOT going to be able to get a fisheye in the near future. 
> However, I am
> still looking at other lenses. The E-Zuiko 14-54 F2.8 caught my eye....seems 
> to be better
> constructed than the 14-54 F3.5. Is the F2.8 worth the extra $$?
> 
> Thanks again.
> 
> - Ali
> 
> 
> 
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
> 
> 




==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================