I've got my screen profiled but I haven't gotten to the scanner and
printer yet so I can't comment on how PWP compares with PhotoShop on
printing with profiles.
But I do agree that PWP is a static product. However, it still does
certain things extraordinarily well and I'll keep using it from time to
time.
Chuck Norcutt
ScottGee1 wrote:
> I followed up on Chuck's comment and after doing some Web research, it
> seems PWP and support for it are flagging. Sachs still sells the full
> version for US$90 at the Digital Light & Color site, but it seems
> clear that he is moving on to other pursuits.
>
> drycreekphoto had this to say about PWP:
>
> =============
> Picture Window Pro 3.1 and above (Windows and Linux only): A powerful
> image editor with ICC profile support. The profile conversion routines
> in Picture Window Pro (as of version 3.5.0.9) give mediocre results.
> Shadow details in particular are plugged up. Also, the match between
> soft proof and print is not as good as with the products listed above.
>
> LINK: http://drycreekphoto.com/Frontier/using_printer_profiles.htm
> =============
>
> The "products listed above" are PS, QImage and CorelDRAW 10 and above.
>
> ScottGee1
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|