Perhaps for the same reason that I did not notice that my Contax G2's
viewfinder was v.small and that my E-1's viewfinder gives me no grief
whatsoever.
And yes, 0300 is an inappropriate time to be asking that sort of
question ... ;-)
Chris
~~ >-)-
C M I Barker
Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.
+44 (0)7092 251126
www.threeshoes.co.uk
homepage.mac.com/zuiko
On 9 Jan 2006, at 03:10, savvo wrote:
> A few times in my sordid past I've handled C*n 300D & 350Ds and I've
> always been appalled at the tiny, tiny viewfinder.
>
> Comparing the specs I had written off the N*n D70s for the same
> reason.
>
> A couple of days ago I was photographing my niece in the studio at
> college using an RB67. After two rolls of Portra I thought why not
> shoot
> some digital? So i took a D70s from the stores. Some hours later it
> struck me that I hadn't noticed anything lacking in the viewfinder.
> Yet
> the figures suggest it should be slightly worse than the C-machine in
> the minusculity stakes.
>
> So why does 95% x 0.75 cause me less grief (fewer griefs?) than 95%
> x 0.8 ?
>
> And is it right to be asking these kind of questions at 3am?
>
> --
> Chris
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|