On 1/15/06, Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> It would seem that Lightroom is probably not an upgrade to PS but a
> separate application dedicated to dealing with digital images. It
> would seem that PS is likely to become to big if it includes the
> functions of Camera Raw as well as the cataloguing processes that
> Lightroom has. Bridge seems to have been a stop along the way.
>
> Also, I find Lightroom much easier to use than PS; however, that
> might be because PS has taught me stuff ...
>
> Chris
Hi Chris,
Do tell a bit more about the Camera RAW functions, if your please.
That Lightroom might exceed PS in cataloguing is less surprising. I
think Adobe wants us to buy a whole separate product to get that.
Actually, if I could get MS to let us see ORF thumbnails in Explorer
like the C/N throngs, I'd be a happy camper in the cataloguing dept.
(notice I included the otiose "u" just to be unctious).
Not that even the finest Camera RAW functions are likely to get me to
jump platforms. :(
Joel W.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|