I have to agree that it is overexposed but I think your fixes have gone
a little too far in the opposite direction. Definitely more pop! but
too contrasty for my taste since much of the shadow detail has been
lost. In any case, not bad for stepping outside the door, aiming,
focusing and popping the shutter. Had this thing been shot in raw it's
clear there would be a lot of detail that could be drawn out.
My main point in taking this shot with a 17mm lens was to see if I could
see evidence of lots of purple fringing or any other uglies that are
supposed to appear with non-telecentric wide angle lenses on full frame
cameras. I didn't find any uglies so I'm happy.
And it sure is nice to have a big viewfinder again.
Chuck Norcutt
Moose wrote:
> Moose wrote:
>
>
>>Even in JPEG, rebalancing the exposure and overall contrast and playing
>>with the contrast in the high end can pull all sorts of detail out to
>>where it's visible and give the images a little pop. I didn't get the
>>lower left of the full frame shot quite right, but I'm not going to bust
>>a get getting a little JPEG perfect
>>
>
> Good heavens, where did that odd link come from?
> <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/MPhotos/5D_17.htm>
>
> Moose
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|