I'm really not sure I understand your point. My point is that below 2MP
most cameras were pretty primitive. They're too far back in the digital
age. Above 3MP they're too expensive and I don't need that much for
small prints. Above 3MP they also tend to use something other than CF.
Ergo, 2-3MP is the size I'm looking for.
Chuck Norcutt
Winsor Crosby wrote:
> Why 3MP? Most cams will make smaller images.
>
>
>
> Winsor
> Long Beach, California, USA
>
>
>
>
> On Jan 26, 2006, at 2:18 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>
>
>>I'm looking for a used 2-3 MP point & shoot camera for 100 bucks or
>>less. Something like the Nikon Coolpix 8xx series would probably be
>>good. 3MP, compact flash, and 2.5X zoom range. KEH sells them for
>>$80-85.
>>
>>I'd specify an Oly model if I knew one in the range. Oly (and most
>>other) point & shoots are mostly a mystery to me. I can't keep up
>>with
>>the model of the week.
>>
>>Anyhow, my only really firm requirements are that it be a brand I know
>>and respect, have a modest zoom range, cost less than $100, be less
>>than
>>4MP, and must take CF cards. SD cards, XD cards, playing cards and
>>all
>>other cards will be rejected. :-)
>>
>>Chuck Norcutt
>>
>>
>>==============================================
>>List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>>List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>>==============================================
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|