Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Irritating question #183--Which scanner to get

Subject: [OM] Re: Irritating question #183--Which scanner to get
From: Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 17:11:40 -0800
AG Schnozz wrote:

>So, should I just get the Nikon V-ED and call it a day?  Or
>should I risk it and get the Minolta 5400E?
>  
>
The 5400E is obviously a good scanner. With your experience with 
scanning a and VueScan expertise, I can't imagine you wouldn't get 
exceptional scans with either it or the Nikon.

However, it's a business decision, isn't it? So I'll take off the 
amateur hat of my last post and put on the analyst hat I used for so 
many years in business.

After some time making your own prints for commercial jobs, you found 
that it was better business to have the printing done by specialists. In 
theory, you should investigate price and quality of outside scanning 
services. Emotionally, though, I suspect that the risk of loss or damage 
to your original film would make this a non-starter, even if price and 
quality make business sense.

Depending on the potential income streams from the scanned images and 
the alternative income producing uses of your time, a more expensive 
initial capital outlay may be the cheaper overall solution.

In one important sense, I'm not sure either of the scanners you mention 
is the best answer.  The Nikon 5000 ED and slide feeder cost about 
$1,500 new and can batch feed 50 slides at once unattended. If you have 
something in the low thousands of slides you want to scan, it sounds 
pretty likely that you would be way ahead to buy Nikon with slide 
feeder, scan everything in unattended batches, and then sell the feeder. 
By then, you would have a very good idea of what's involved in scanning 
all the neg strips and how well the scanner meets your B&W needs. Then 
you either keep it to do the rest of the scanning or find another 
solution and sell it too.

Assuming 2,000 slides and a net loss on purchase and resale of scanner 
and loader of $700, you have an out of pocket cost of 35 cents per 
slide, right around the low end of commercial services. More slides, 
lower per image cost. Of course, you will have time costs in setting up, 
testing and getting the setup right to get good scans, amortizes over 
lots of slides, but very little in actually doing the scans.

Either way, the combo should have more than paid for itself in time 
saved for other productive work compared to putting slides in and 
scanning them 4 at a time on the V-ED or 5400E. You could get some spare 
slide holders to pre load, but it would still be very labor intensive in 
comparison.

You could set up 50 slide stacks ahead of time and just drop by from 
time to time to feed them in, or even have others in the family who are 
home feed them to the scanner when you are out doing other things. 
Another thing to remember is that ICE means never having to go through 
and clean the slides before scanning or spot afterwards (well, ok, very, 
very seldom). The whole slide part of the project could be fininshed and 
out of the way very quickly.

Moose


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz