TAKO. INTERNET SEIT 1996.
Olympus-OM

[OM] Re: : Digital vs film resolution

Subject: [OM] Re: : Digital vs film resolution
From: Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 07:35:37 +1100
Would you buy a Canon 5D or a Nikon D200 with the cheap, slow,  
consumer 35-80mm or 28-90mm? Of course it is possible to get good  
results with these consumer grade lenses in optimum conditions  
but...  And some people seem to have got good samples. But I heartily  
disliked the 17.5-45mm I was lent with the E-500 and while the  
14-45mm seems better, it won't satisfy a critical shooter like yourself.
AndrewF


On 09/03/2006, at 10:20 PM, Brian Swale wrote:

>
>
> Hi Chuck & all
>
> This argument avoids the contribution of lens quality.
>
> I am increasingly not satisfied with the 14-45mm DZuiko, yet people  
> keep
> saying how good the E-1 is. The  gap in the argument must be the lens.
>
> Brian
>>
>> I never have understood why low resolution digital looks so good
>> compared to film until I found this.  Now it all makes sense.
>> <http://www.luminous-landscape.com/essays/clumps.shtml>
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>