Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Bibble

Subject: [OM] Re: Bibble
From: "Joel Wilcox" <jfwilcox@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2006 09:18:08 -0500
Thanks Bernard. It's interesting to try to absorb your experiences.  I
agree with you where our experience overlaps.  I use ACR for quick and
dirty conversions but wait for Viewer for the important stuff.  I
upgraded to v.1.5 in hopes for some improvements in the way it works
with memory, but it's no better.  I think our processors are just too
old and slow.

When I move to a higher MP camera (even if it be only an E-330), I
will have to get a new PC first.  I can just barely stand it now when
working with E-1 files in Viewer.  (Mac people: please don't tell me
to get a Mac.  I am dead to advice and already know how to beat
Windows into submission.)

Joel W.

On 4/8/06, Bernard Frangoulis <lists@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >While it is interesting to see Apple and Adobe grinding slowly towardÊ
> >a raw workflow product for photographers with Aperture and Lightroom,Ê
> >but Bibble seems to be there already with speed and interesting toolsÊ
> >for both Mac and PC. Anyone using it and care to share your experience?
> >
> >http://www.bibblelabs.com/
> >
>
> I tried it on my Mac, which is an old one (G4 450MHz bi-procesor). It is very 
> slow, slower than Adobe Camera Raw or Silky Pix or Raw Developer, much slower 
> than Capture One. Funny, since it is heralded as the quickest raw converter - 
> maybe the demo version does not take advantage of the 2 processors (these 2 
> processors are what gave this aging Mac such a long lease of life).
>
> And the interface is truly hideous, in my opinion at least, very much out of 
> place on Mac OS X. Very crude.
>
> Thus, although the software capabilities seem interesting, and the price is 
> right, I did not try any further. On a more recent Mac, if the speed is 
> acceptable, and one can overcome the interface (not sure I could), it might 
> be a good program!
>
> For now, I have settled on :
> * Capture One LE as my raw converter of choice. The colors and speed are OK, 
> the interface and workflow are nice. The Pro version has some additional 
> niceties, but at 500 $ is much too expensive.
> * Raw Developer (Mac Only): I bought it too. Good colors and fine controls, 
> nice interface. Not as polished as C1, but a lot of potential (look up its 
> review on Digital Outback Photo).
> * SilkyPix: good colors, the interface is a little bit disconcerting (the 
> tranlation from Japanese is strange...). But my trial period has ended, I 
> cannot try the advanced controls. Seems good though, I might buy it as well.
>
> Others I have tried but not liked:
> * Olympus Viewer gives good results, but the speed is glacial and I don't 
> like the interface.
> * Didn't try Studio, but from what I read I would not like it.
> * I don't like ACR (for Olympus files at least), I find it difficult to get 
> good colors with it for .orf files, and I never succeeded in calibrating it 
> to my satisfaction (I tried maybe 10 times). The interface and workflow are 
> fine though.
> * I cannot try Lightroom, it is for Mac OS X 10.4 only, I use 10.3 - and I 
> guess its rendering angine is that of ACR anyway.
>
> Bernard
==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz